Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Date: 2011-05-04 15:30:03
Message-ID: BANLkTi=hBPJv=hSS_Bg1rfxWz9QtTRiTmg@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> To make PG do it automatically, we'd need to store the _init forks in
> a different tablespace from the remaining forks.  That's probably
> possible, but it seems complicated.

Sounds much better way actually and also quite easy. All we do is keep
the init forks in a subdirectory that identifies the tablespace they
relate to.

-- 
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg StarkDate: 2011-05-04 15:38:50
Subject: Re: patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2011-05-04 15:26:47
Subject: Re: patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-05-04 15:51:57
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Previous:From: Adrian KlaverDate: 2011-05-04 15:22:34
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group