Re: GUC assign hooks (was Re: wal_buffers = -1 and SIGHUP)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GUC assign hooks (was Re: wal_buffers = -1 and SIGHUP)
Date: 2011-04-04 21:22:33
Message-ID: BANLkTi=cnnGTs=wAZPyQDCC9E+aOHWHijg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> OK.  Please comment the crap out of whatever you do, or maybe even add
>> a README.  This stuff is just a bit arcane, and guideposts help a lot.
>
> We already have a README for that ;-).  PFA, a patch to
> src/backend/utils/misc/README describing the proposed revised API.
> If nobody has any objections, I'll get on with making this happen.

Looks reasonable to me.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-04-04 21:31:19 Re: Extensions Dependency Checking
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2011-04-04 21:19:22 Re: small fix for Windows build