Re: Branch 1.14?

Let's play jeopardy:

Is 7.3 really the current minimum version for pgAdmin 1.14 or 1.15?

OR

Shouldn't the minimum version of pgAdmin reflect the minimum version
supported/patched by PostgreSQL (currently 8.2.21)?

Which question matches your answer?

2011/6/14 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>

> Yes, I think so.
>
> On Tuesday, June 14, 2011, Jasmin Dizdarevic
> <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > =)
> > BTW:
> > [...]The application may be used on Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris, Mac OSX and
> Windows platforms to manage PostgreSQL 7.3 and above running on any
> platform[...]
> >
> > Is 7.3 really the current minimum version for pgAdmin 1.14 or 1.15?
> > Shouldn't the minimum version of pgAdmin reflect the minimum version
> supported/patched by PostgreSQL (currently 8.2.21)?
> >
> > 2011/6/14 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 22:00 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, June 14, 2011, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 20:57 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote:
> >> >> Excuse me? *g*
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Yeah, I don't think I'll have the time to work on new features now.
> Too
> >> > much other things to do.
> >>
> >> I think Jasmine is alluding to the object search patch that's in
> progress :-)
> >>
> >
> > Oops, sorry, forgot that patch.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Guillaume
> > http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
> > http://www.dalibo.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>