Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: time table for beta1

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: time table for beta1
Date: 2011-04-04 16:13:12
Message-ID: BANLkTi=OJqO2mCV4CWQmfs2QgX8CE=_nWw@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>  At the risk of getting laughed at, how about, say, ~2 weeks from now?
>>
>> Seems reasonable to me.
>>
>>>  Plus or minus a couple of days based on people's schedules and which
>>> day of the week we'd like the wrap to happen on.
>>
>> Betas are usually done using the regular release process, which is
>> wrap-on-Thursday-release-on-Monday (to accommodate both packagers who
>> work weekdays and those who can only spare time on weekends).  So we'd
>> really be talking about code freeze on the 14th if we want release on
>> the 18th.  That might be a bit ambitious, but we can always slip it a
>> week if unforeseen problems crop up.
>
> The following weekend appears to be Easter, so it'd have to be a 2 week slip.

Well, that's certainly an incentive to try to hit the April 14th date.
 Having to wait until April 28th would be the pits, IMHO.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Gabriele BartoliniDate: 2011-04-04 16:23:57
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-04-04 16:08:38
Subject: Re: Compiling a static libpq

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group