On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>  At the risk of getting laughed at, how about, say, ~2 weeks from now?
>>
>> Seems reasonable to me.
>>
>>>  Plus or minus a couple of days based on people's schedules and which
>>> day of the week we'd like the wrap to happen on.
>>
>> Betas are usually done using the regular release process, which is
>> wrap-on-Thursday-release-on-Monday (to accommodate both packagers who
>> work weekdays and those who can only spare time on weekends).  So we'd
>> really be talking about code freeze on the 14th if we want release on
>> the 18th.  That might be a bit ambitious, but we can always slip it a
>> week if unforeseen problems crop up.
>
> The following weekend appears to be Easter, so it'd have to be a 2 week slip.

Well, that's certainly an incentive to try to hit the April 14th date.
 Having to wait until April 28th would be the pits, IMHO.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

• Re: time table for beta1 at 2011-04-04 16:01:32 from Dave Page

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Gabriele Bartolini	Date: 2011-04-04 16:23:57
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations
Previous:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2011-04-04 16:08:38
	Subject: Re: Compiling a static libpq