On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> At the risk of getting laughed at, how about, say, ~2 weeks from now?
>> Seems reasonable to me.
>>> Plus or minus a couple of days based on people's schedules and which
>>> day of the week we'd like the wrap to happen on.
>> Betas are usually done using the regular release process, which is
>> wrap-on-Thursday-release-on-Monday (to accommodate both packagers who
>> work weekdays and those who can only spare time on weekends). So we'd
>> really be talking about code freeze on the 14th if we want release on
>> the 18th. That might be a bit ambitious, but we can always slip it a
>> week if unforeseen problems crop up.
> The following weekend appears to be Easter, so it'd have to be a 2 week slip.
Well, that's certainly an incentive to try to hit the April 14th date.
Having to wait until April 28th would be the pits, IMHO.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Gabriele Bartolini||Date: 2011-04-04 16:23:57|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-04-04 16:08:38|
|Subject: Re: Compiling a static libpq|