Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Mailing Lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Date: 2011-05-31 15:13:13
Message-ID: BANLkTi=NwyF=9zBeVmCOnnVoyn3ycznF9g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 09:33 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> IIRC, both of them think that you should log into the web interface to
>> send emails (which, in the case of Bugzilla, don't permit replies),
>> rather than sending emails that show up in the web interface.
>
> I think you probably need to look at Bugzilla again. Here's what the current
> feature page at <http://www.bugzilla.org/features/#email-in> says:
>
>   In addition to the web interface, you can send Bugzilla an email
>   that will create a new bug, or will modify an existing bug.

That's possible. I haven't used it in about 5 years, and I suppose
that makes my opinion of it hideously dated. I wouldn't like it if
someone judged PostgreSQL based on what 8.1 can do.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-05-31 15:14:02 Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Previous Message ktm@rice.edu 2011-05-31 15:04:28 Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project