Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations
Date: 2011-04-04 18:48:49
Message-ID: BANLkTi=M5=Js_UkLc-P-5EFmkpiFk-Vyvg@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Even if that doesn't turn out to be the case, this is pretty harmless,
>> so maybe we should just apply it and move on.
>
> I have no great objection to the patch as such; just wondering what the
> roadmap is.

Me, too.

On a practical level, if we're going to do this, shouldn't we also do
!entity -> !ENTITY in Solution.pm?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2011-04-04 18:50:13
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-04-04 18:42:07
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2011-04-04 18:50:13
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-04-04 18:43:25
Subject: Re: time table for beta1

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group