Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Branch 1.14?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?
Date: 2011-06-14 14:25:32
Message-ID: BANLkTi=JNkMGn=0BrFUv85JPPj-7+EojrQ@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 11:25 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > PostgreSQL already created a 9.1 branch, so that new features could be
>> > commited on head. Actually, there'll be a commitfest starting tomorrow.
>> > Should we also create a new branch, so that new features could be
>> > applied on head?
>> >
>> > I have no features right now to commit and push, but it could be
>> > interesting nevertheless.
>>
>> If there's nothing to commit, then all it means it that we'll have to
>> start double-patching bugfixes for no gain.
>>
>
> OK, so we open it as soon as we have a commit to push?

Yes.

-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2011-06-14 18:50:10
Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?
Previous:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2011-06-14 13:59:58
Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group