Re: Fwd: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific

From: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific
Date: 2011-06-21 01:25:07
Message-ID: BANLkTi=720TWHg+h4QTNYthnZ=t1MZrDXQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 21 June 2011 11:11, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> I realize I took out most of the fun of this patch from you, but -- are
> you still planning to do some more exhaustive testing of it?  I checked
> some funny scenarios (including include files and groups) but it's not
> all that unlikely that I missed some cases.  I also didn't check any
> auth method other than ident, md5 and trust, 'cause I don't have what's
> required for anything else.  (It's a pity that the regression tests
> don't exercise anything else.)

I've pretty much tested all the things I can think to test, and I'm in
the same boat as you re auth methods. If there are bugs, I think they
will be of the obscure kind, that only reveal themselves under
peculiar circumstances.

Cheers,
BJ

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Ports 2011-06-21 02:18:28 Re: pika buildfarm member failure on isolationCheck tests
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-06-21 01:11:59 Re: Fwd: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific