On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> On 03.04.2011 19:38, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Dave Page<dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
>>> I can't help thinking I must be missing something obvious here, but is
>>> there any way to persist some data from PlanForeignScan to at least
>>> BeginForeignScan in an FDW? I'm aware of fdwplan->fdw_private, but at
>>> that needs to be copyObject compatible, it's not much use to me.
> If you have to, you can encapsulate arbitrary data in a bytea const.
>> Or you could use a hash of some other identifying information (perhaps
>> the OID of the foreign server would be sufficient ID for a connection?).
> Foreign server + user id, probably. That's what I would recommend in this
And database in some cases, but yes :-)
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2011-04-04 08:54:04|
|Subject: synchronous_commit and synchronous_replication Re: [COMMITTERS]
pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.|
|Previous:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2011-04-04 08:31:31|
|Subject: Re: FDW state from plan time|