Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Process local hint bit cache

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Process local hint bit cache
Date: 2011-06-29 03:03:47
Message-ID: BANLkTi=+NGjJu2c1Ht4n8_J0C7EWvc0pNA@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>                        int ByteOffset = xid / BITS_PER_BYTE;
>
> whoops, I just notice this was wrong -- the byte offset needs to be
> taking bucket into account.  I need to clean this up some more
> obviously, but the issues at play remain the same....

So, where is the latest version of this patch?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2011-06-29 03:52:08
Subject: Inconsistency between postgresql.conf and docs
Previous:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2011-06-29 03:02:54
Subject: Re: Range Types, constructors, and the type system

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group