Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Extensions Dependency Checking

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extensions Dependency Checking
Date: 2011-04-04 22:12:59
Message-ID: B7283A86-2092-497A-A310-B0B9F2E2DFC3@kineticode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Apr 4, 2011, at 2:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Once 9.1 is out, it'll probably be too late to dictate any semantics for
> version numbers, because somebody will have done something incompatible
> with it before 9.2 is released.  If we are going to try to insist on
> this, now is the time.

Yes, exactly my point. If it's going to be done, it should be now.

> But I don't agree with that position.

Why not?

Best.

David


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Aidan Van DykDate: 2011-04-04 22:23:20
Subject: Re: Extensions Dependency Checking
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-04-04 22:06:57
Subject: Re: Extensions Dependency Checking

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group