| From: | decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org |
| Date: | 2009-07-10 15:19:38 |
| Message-ID: | B585A939-F124-4CD6-B61E-BB151AD77711@decibel.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Jul 9, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Brendan Jurd wrote:
> We don't AFAIK collect data about these events. However, we could
> have certain actions trigger the creation of an automated comment
> (e.g., "Status changed to Committed by petere") and let the
> aforementioned comment view suffice for a "history".
Our main system at work does that; any kind of status is stored as a
raw, text "note". It sucks. It makes trying to query for specific
kinds of events difficult, and it wastes a bunch of space.
It's a lot better to record machine-readable information for machine-
created events. If you want to present it all as one, I suggest a
union view that turns the machine-understood data into a human-
understandable text format.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-07-10 15:22:43 | Re: *_collapse_limit, geqo_threshold |
| Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2009-07-10 09:00:52 | Re: Launching commitfest.postgresql.org |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-07-10 16:29:52 | Re: CertFirst training event listings |
| Previous Message | Chander Ganesan | 2009-07-10 14:33:44 | Re: Vacation time -- pgsql|{jobs-bugs} list moderation |