On May 13, 2007, at 6:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
>> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 06:48:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Surely a section should not *begin* with a cross-reference to
>>> someplace else.
>> My concern is that folks will see the table right below it, not find
>> what they're looking for there, and move on... what about immediately
>> after the table?
> Immediately after is fine with me. For that matter, you could
> get away with putting it between the introductory para and the table
> proper. I'm just allergic to sections that don't begin with a topic
> sentence telling you what they are about.
See attached. I wanted to not put it between the paragraph
referencing the table and the table itself, but couldn't think of a
better intro paragraph for the section...
Description: application/octet-stream (845 bytes)
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2007-05-14 19:16:15|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] OS/X startup scripts|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Hammond||Date: 2007-05-14 17:56:23|
|Subject: Re: On patching without write access to CVS|