Re: LIMIT NULL

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LIMIT NULL
Date: 2009-02-02 19:03:29
Message-ID: B29CA2FD-2638-4D0C-BD8E-A2604B7B9955@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Feb 2, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> It's worked the way it does now since 7.1, and no one has complained;
> in fact we've gotten bug reports when it was broken by the int8-limit
> patch. So there are people depending on the behavior.

Yeah, it's very useful. Here's a patch for the docs about it.

Thanks,

David

Attachment Content-Type Size
limit-null.patch application/octet-stream 704 bytes
unknown_filename text/plain 1 byte

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ries van Twisk 2009-02-02 19:20:43 Re: [NOVICE] LATIN2->UTF8 conversation with dblink
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-02-02 18:31:54 Re: [NOVICE] LATIN2->UTF8 conversation with dblink