Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: latest hstore patch

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: latest hstore patch
Date: 2009-09-25 04:52:34
Message-ID: B0F2CAC1-A584-4800-85C7-D1DA01099B3D@kineticode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sep 23, 2009, at 5:27 PM, Andrew Gierth wrote:

> I intentionally avoided hstore_to_array because it would be unclear
> which one it meant (the 1-d or 2-d result).

Thanks Andrew.

Given these replies, unless anyone else wants to weigh in on the array  
conversion operator and function names, this patch is ready for  
committer review (along with my tiny doc patch). I'll update the  
commitfest site to that effect.

Thanks,

David


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2009-09-25 04:56:23
Subject: Re: plpgsql function is so slow
Previous:From: Euler Taveira de OliveiraDate: 2009-09-25 03:49:46
Subject: Re: plpgsql function is so slow

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group