Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Large Objects with OID > 2147483647

From: "Albe Laurenz" <all(at)adv(dot)magwien(dot)gv(dot)at>
To: "Kris Jurka *EXTERN*" <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Large Objects with OID > 2147483647
Date: 2007-02-19 08:44:22
Message-ID: AFCCBB403D7E7A4581E48F20AF3E5DB2013F2A36@EXADV1.host.magwien.gv.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
>> So accessing Large Objects with OID > 2147483647 as BLOB will not
>> work, right? I think that 'long' would be more appropriate than
'int'.
> 
> I have put a fix into CVS for 8.1, 8.2 and head drivers that stores
the 
> OIDs as longs insteads of ints.

Cool, thank you!

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Guillaume SmetDate: 2007-02-19 09:14:30
Subject: Re: Memory leaks using refcursors
Previous:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2007-02-19 06:07:37
Subject: Re: Large Objects with OID > 2147483647

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group