Re: What happened to SSL_CIPHERS?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What happened to SSL_CIPHERS?
Date: 2010-12-18 16:12:27
Message-ID: AANLkTinz3O70VnqdkrucUocnnXrHtZmvfyw-QfaOXqPg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 02:25, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> On 12/15/10 4:58 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> > In any case, a doc patch would be the right thing for the back branches.
>>
>> I can look at this too (yes, I know we just wrapped, but I'm working
>> down the backlog :S). You mean something as simple as "this parameter
>> is unavailable if the server was not compiled with support for SSL"?
>
> Exactly.  If you don't get around to it, bug me in January.

Done, and applied (doc patch for back branches, code patch for HEAD)

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2010-12-18 16:35:34 Re: BUG #5792: INSTALLER FAILS!!!
Previous Message H.Merijn Brand 2010-12-18 12:34:23 Re: [Fwd: DBD::Pg on HP-UX 11.31 64bit]