Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: About our GSoC projects

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: About our GSoC projects
Date: 2010-08-18 08:32:05
Message-ID: AANLkTinwOfLSjBnQtGX-Xru7DWsDS2cW-07nBOJ5ov4=@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:25, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> You are supposed to work by having one "his branch" on his repo and
>> one "gleus branch" on your repo. Then you merge with his, and if you
>> make changes, he merges with yours, back and forth until you agree on
>> something that's good. At that point, you merge this (with squash,
>> please :P) into the main repository and push that.
>
> That seems like a nice way to waste a lot of time.

That really depends on the workflow. It can be pretty darn efficient,
particularly if you work with semi-working features.

But it does take a different mindset - if you work on it with the
traditional mindset, it's indeed a huge waste of time.


>>> If I understood correctly, yeah, I would like that to happen. The
>>> sooner, the better. I don't really know if we should use the same
>>> account or a different one. I actually don't care.
>>
>> Dave, any comment on that?
>
> The same account seems fine to me.

Ok. I'll look into that then.

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2010-08-18 08:37:20
Subject: Re: About our GSoC projects
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-08-18 08:25:20
Subject: Re: About our GSoC projects

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group