Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

From: Samuel Gendler <sgendler(at)ideasculptor(dot)com>
To: mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "david(at)lang(dot)hm" <david(at)lang(dot)hm>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Date: 2011-02-02 04:07:47
Message-ID: AANLkTinvAvUZGj7_XBUco5GPwiBcwGUvix-06rHPCFEO@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Mladen Gogala <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com>wrote:

> Samuel Gendler wrote:
>
>>
>>  Don't listen to him.  He's got an oracle bias.
>>
> And bad sinuses, too.
>
>   Slashdot already announced that NoSQL is actually going to dominate the
>> world, so postgres has already lost that battle.  Everything postgres devs
>> do now is just an exercise in relational masturbation.  Trust me.
>>
>>  I knew that there is some entertainment value on this list. Samuel, your
> point of view is very..., er, refreshing. Trust me.
>
>
You get that that was sarcasm, right?


>
>

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Noah MischDate: 2011-02-02 05:20:04
Subject: Re: Exhaustive list of what takes what locks
Previous:From: Mladen GogalaDate: 2011-02-02 03:40:16
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joachim WielandDate: 2011-02-02 04:32:22
Subject: Re: pg_dump directory archive format / parallel pg_dump
Previous:From: Mladen GogalaDate: 2011-02-02 03:40:16
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group