On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>> How long should I wait before I start breaking things?
>>> Did you have any particular breakage in mind?
>> Well, you can see for yourself what I've submitted for the next CF.
> You might want to hold off on the get_whatever_oid patches for a bit,
> but the other stuff I see there looks pretty localized. No objection
> to pressing forward with CF work otherwise.
I can hold off on those for a bit - I don't think there will be enough
drift to matter very much, but if it makes you more comfortable, it's
not a big deal. What I really want to get committed is this one,
which is infrastructure for a further large patch:
include Backend ID in relpath for temp rels
However, I need someone fairly knowledgeable to review it first.
The Enterprise Postgres Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-07-09 14:35:10|
|Subject: Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-07-09 14:07:33|
|Subject: Re: ExecutorCheckPerms() hook|
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2010-07-09 14:51:27|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add a hook in ExecCheckRTPerms().|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-07-09 14:06:01|
|Subject: pgsql: Add a hook in ExecCheckRTPerms().|