On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 03:04, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
>> Personally, my utility for the old repo is not much (if it was anything
>> important, I wouldn't have relied on the unofficial repo). But we should
>> probably give a little bit of warning for folks that might want to
>> rebase or translate some old notes.
> Well, I guess the question is how much warning. I suggested O(1 week)
> but Robert seems to want O(1 year). As long as there's some agreed
> deadline, I'm not very picky about what it is.
I don't need to get rid of it *now*, but I agree a deadline is good.
How about we either say "when 9.1 is released", or we say "september
2011" because that's a year after we made the switch?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2010-12-31 10:06:12|
|Subject: Re: Sync Rep Design|
|Previous:||From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner||Date: 2010-12-31 09:42:14|
|Subject: Re: Snapshot synchronization, again...|