| From: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH] |
| Date: | 2011-02-01 17:04:47 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinmF5=bEcsJnwT-x_UUTTd3AJB2C6EFcd0ogSsX@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 01:34, Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> I've looked at the patch and added a test for arrays exceeding or equal maximum dimensions to check, whether the recursive function won't bring surprises there. I've also added check_stack_depth calls to both split_array and plperl_hash_from_tuple. Note that the regression fails currently due to the incorrect error reporting in
> PostgreSQL, per http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-01/msg02888.php.
Looks good. Marked as "Ready for committer"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-02-01 17:19:29 | Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27 |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-02-01 17:01:39 | Re: SSI patch version 14 |