Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SR slaves and .pgpass

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SR slaves and .pgpass
Date: 2010-06-09 05:24:57
Message-ID: AANLkTinm05jTPQHSgixYGFNeA9vf4u0OtlJu1laD37fZ@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> There is precedent for .pgpass being a bit ambiguous. See the way
> "localhost" is used.

OK. The attached patch allows us to use "replication" in the database
field of the .pgpass file, for the replication connection.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment: pgpass_v1.patch
Description: application/octet-stream (4.8 KB)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: KaiGai KoheiDate: 2010-06-09 06:01:13
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix leaky VIEWs for RLS
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2010-06-09 03:52:55
Subject: Re: SR slaves and .pgpass

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group