Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PROPOSAL of xmlvalidate

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomáš Pospíšil <killteck(at)seznam(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, chmelab(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL of xmlvalidate
Date: 2010-11-29 17:36:37
Message-ID: AANLkTinjmVmY53BgdXUHecZm+vX5yW92HsRENO9fOHpE@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2010/11/29 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Tomáš Pospíšil <killteck(at)seznam(dot)cz> wrote:
>>> I have idea of creating system table for holding DTDs, XSDs, Relax-NGs (similar as on ORACLE).
>>>
>>> Is that good idea?
>>
>> I doubt it.  Why would we want to do that?
>
> If I understand, it allows a local copy of DTD, .. so then is possible
> to provide a fast DTD checking.

But that could equally well be stored in a user table rather than a
system table.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andres FreundDate: 2010-11-29 17:49:12
Subject: Re: profiling connection overhead
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-11-29 17:35:49
Subject: Re: pg_execute_from_file review

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group