Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Support for Slony 2.0?

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Support for Slony 2.0?
Date: 2011-01-20 19:15:46
Message-ID: AANLkTinjfHxUaQqwTRQKLWGeLBDN_bv0vZM6dhqZCOhC@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
Why don't we have a wizard-type facility to generate a Slonik script,
rather than calling the "bare-metal" functions ourselves? That could
potentially be much more useful. The reason that the existing
facilities are a bit of a chore to use when you get past a couple of
nodes is that paths and listens have to be individually managed, and
the number involved increases quadratically with respect to the number
of nodes. In other words, it's a GUI analogue of writing a Slonik
script, as opposed to a higher level facility that usefully abstracts
details away.

I could imagine this really helping with complicated Slony setups
involving daisy-chaining.

-- 
Regards,
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2011-01-20 20:39:47
Subject: Re: Support for Slony 2.0?
Previous:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2011-01-20 19:03:51
Subject: Re: Support for Slony 2.0?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group