Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Useless sort by

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: gnuoytr(at)rcn(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Useless sort by
Date: 2010-09-23 04:46:16
Message-ID: AANLkTinjaB1Y_9U+pt1hF-GOHPyQuTaFDkRJRmyR=DUa@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:05 PM,  <gnuoytr(at)rcn(dot)com> wrote:
> Spoken like a dyed in the wool COBOL coder.  The RM has no need for order; it's set based.  I've dabbled in PG for some time, and my sense is increasingly that PG developers are truly code oriented, not database (set) oriented.

I'm struggling to think of an adequate response to this.  I think I'm
going to go with: huh?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: gnuoytrDate: 2010-09-23 13:51:16
Subject: Re: Useless sort by
Previous:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2010-09-23 04:18:27
Subject: Re: Useless sort by

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group