Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ECPG FETCH readahead

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Böszörményi Zoltán <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
Date: 2010-10-13 23:47:14
Message-ID: AANLkTinij9ULnS54zKsdAJnhvuj-07-8-T-D=Nwk6f14@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:04:30PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Is there a reason not to enable it by default? I'm a bit worried
>> that it will receive no testing if it's not always on.
>
> Yes, there is a reason, namely that you don't need it in native mode at all.
> ECPG can read as many records as you want in one go, something ESQL/C
> apparently cannot do. This patch is a workaround for that restriction. I still
> do not really see that this feature gives us an advantage in native mode
> though.

So, who has the next action on this patch?  Does Zoltan need to revise
it, or does Michael need to review it, or where are we?

Thanks,

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Christian UllrichDate: 2010-10-14 00:30:43
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Text search parser's treatment of URLs and emails
Previous:From: fazool meinDate: 2010-10-13 23:23:57
Subject: Timeline in the light of Synchronous replication

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group