On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:04:30PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Is there a reason not to enable it by default? I'm a bit worried
>> that it will receive no testing if it's not always on.
> Yes, there is a reason, namely that you don't need it in native mode at all.
> ECPG can read as many records as you want in one go, something ESQL/C
> apparently cannot do. This patch is a workaround for that restriction. I still
> do not really see that this feature gives us an advantage in native mode
So, who has the next action on this patch? Does Zoltan need to revise
it, or does Michael need to review it, or where are we?
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Christian Ullrich||Date: 2010-10-14 00:30:43|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Text search parser's treatment of URLs and emails|
|Previous:||From: fazool mein||Date: 2010-10-13 23:23:57|
|Subject: Timeline in the light of Synchronous replication|