On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Tatsuhito Kasahara <kasahara(dot)tatsuhito(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>> When I tested simple query as following, backend process used much memory
>> and not freed until the backend was finished.
>> # This is reproduced on PostgreSQL8.3 (PostgreSQL8.3.6 - PostgreSQL8.3.12)
> Hmm ... this test case doesn't appear to produce any significant memory
> leakage in 8.4 and up. What is happening in 8.3 is that the
> CurTransactionContext of each subtransaction becomes nonempty, so it
> eats 8K or so even though the snapshot gets released shortly later.
> There are plenty of other ways to cause that to happen, though, so I'm
> not particularly excited about fixing this one ... especially not in a
> stable branch that's not getting a lot of developer testing anymore.
> I'm inclined to leave this alone --- I think the risks of patching only
> an old branch will outweigh the benefits.
The proposed patch looks very simple. I don't think that applying that
patch will cause serious risk.
Unless the bug is fixed, the users who encountered the memory-leak
cannot update their postgres to the latest version of 8.3. This would
cause more serious situation. And, since psqlODBC frequently issues
SAVEPONT and RELEASE SAVEPOINT, this memory-leak is not rare case,
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-12-22 02:48:33|
|Subject: Re: memory leaks? using savepoint |
|Previous:||From: Carlo Curatolo||Date: 2010-12-21 15:47:03|
|Subject: BUG #5800: "corrupted" error messages (encoding problem ?)|