Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers
Date: 2011-01-13 22:31:04
Message-ID: AANLkTinhU9EEPGM29S+KH=qK4t-mLhBBNAaLCGQSx-4y@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> +1, I like the idea. Would it still be there to override if necessary?

Depends what people want to do. We could make the default "0kB", and
define that to mean "auto-tune", or we could remove the parameter
altogether. I think I was envisioning the latter, but if people are
hesitant to do that we could do the former instead.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Pflug 2011-01-13 22:59:54 Re: kill -KILL: What happens?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2011-01-13 22:29:06 Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers