Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #5841: rank()+1 fails, 1+rank() succeeds

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jeff(at)biccard(dot)com
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #5841: rank()+1 fails, 1+rank() succeeds
Date: 2011-01-21 17:59:31
Message-ID: AANLkTingY5a3unPNrgg+QfmOX0cU4VWrFtFUcCvvJOuX@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:19 AM,  <jeff(at)biccard(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying. I've submitted a note on the interactive version of
> the docs, and attached a small patch to make explicit that a window function
> is followed _immediately_ by an OVER clause, as the syntax[1] indicates.

I've committed the first hunk of this patch, as I think it's useful
and innocuous.  The second half looks like bad grammar to me.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-01-23 02:51:33
Subject: Re: BUG #5837: PQstatus() fails to report lost connection
Previous:From: Giacomo PetilloDate: 2011-01-21 16:31:21
Subject: Bug in italian help of "pg_dumpall"

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group