On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> AFAICT that would break on-disk compatibility of pg_trgm GIST indexes.
> I don't believe we have adequate evidence to justify doing that, and
> in any case it ought to be a separate patch rather than buried inside a
> mostly unrelated feature patch.
>
Ok. Actually, I don't think just increasement of SIGLENINT as a solution. I
beleive that we need to have it as index parameter. I'll try to provide more
of tests in order to motivate this.
----
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Simon Riggs | Date: 2011-02-01 08:17:55 |
| Subject: Re: Error code for "terminating connection due to
conflict with recovery" |
| Previous: | From: Simon Riggs | Date: 2011-02-01 08:12:57 |
| Subject: Re: Error code for "terminating connection due to
conflict with recovery" |