On 15 August 2010 15:38, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 15 August 2010 10:38, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Another thing I noticed, going back to
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/backup-file.html , is
>>> that it makes no mention of the fact that file system level backups
>>> are useless if being used to restore in a different major version.
>>> Maybe "There are two restrictions, however, which make this method
>>> impractical, or at least inferior to the pg_dump method" should be
>>> changed to "There are three..." and add the point that
>>> pg_dump/pg_dumpall is mostly immune to such limitations.
>> In the docs for version 9.0, I think the following from
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/migration.html should be
>> updated to make mention of streaming replication:
> But you can't use streaming replication for migration...
Hmm... yes, that's referring to migration to a new major version.
Ignore the streaming replication comment.
Registered Linux user: #516935
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-08-15 19:47:19|
|Subject: Re: pgbench acronym tps |
|Previous:||From: Scott Marlowe||Date: 2010-08-15 14:38:32|
|Subject: Re: pg_dump locking info|