| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build |
| Date: | 2011-01-17 22:20:45 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTincfTp965gRRmAxRPFthU+DhUbpOEq+jf0AjpGb@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> Actually, I don't see us maintaining OGL. We don't have the manpower to
> do that.
>
> I'm wondering if we really need OGL. What do we use it for? because if
> it's now out of wxWidgets and if it's an important component for us, we
> aren't probably alone. What do the other guys do? Moreover, if they got
> rid of it, it's also probably because they don't need it, meaning we
> could use something else, available in wxWidgets 2.9 that would replace
> OGL. That would be a really better way than maintaining a fork of OGL.
We use it for drawing graphical query plans, and I believe for the
query builder. Replacing it would probably not be straightforward.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-01-17 22:31:10 | Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2011-01-17 22:19:11 | Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build |