| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, gabrielle <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: multiple -f support |
| Date: | 2011-02-06 17:07:26 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinc_aEL2kKddqXsZOBcvp6cO+vkxfH5kuvE=-5i@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> I assume having psql support multiple -f files is not a high priority or
> something we don't want.
IIRC, nobody objected to the basic concept, and it seems useful. I
thought we were pretty close to committing something along those lines
at one point, actually. I don't remember exactly where the wheels
came off.
Maybe a TODO?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-02-06 17:11:04 | Re: SAVEPOINTs and COMMIT performance |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2011-02-06 16:50:06 | Re: keeping a timestamp of the last stats reset (for a db, table and function) |