Re: Terms.

From: Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Terms.
Date: 2010-09-17 19:03:22
Message-ID: AANLkTinaqVNoyXf0MmtT2KX+zeHnhTSRPkWW1+3sovfZ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Hey Robert,

Hmm. The existing text might be redundant, but I don't think it's
> inaccurate. Since the rest of the section alternates back and forth
> between the two terms, it seems like this might help to remind the
> reader that they are effectively synonymous.
>
I am the reader and just a user of libpq, not a guru :-).
I must admit that this is a trifle, but I think it's indeed inaccurate.
Also I think, that it's inaccurate to call one function PQnfields()
and another PQftablecol(). Yes, terms "field" and "column" are
interchangeable, but (personally) I don't clearly understand why two
functions named not monotonous.
But all of the above is my personal point of view. So, just ignore it
if you don't like it :-)

Regards,
Dmitriy

In response to

  • Re: Terms. at 2010-09-17 12:55:25 from Robert Haas

Responses

  • Re: Terms. at 2010-09-19 02:23:06 from Robert Haas

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-09-19 02:23:06 Re: Terms.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-09-17 12:55:25 Re: Terms.