On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 16:07, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>> Actually, I take it back.
>>> The CHANGELOG on the REL-1_12_PATCHES has some changes for 1.12.1,
>>> 1.12.2, 1.12.3. And surprisingly enough also 1.14.0, which certainly
>>> didn't exist back then...
>> Yes - we've done it that way for years.
> I know - and it's been itching me for years ;)
>>> Which kind of proves my point about the confusion;)
>> Meh. Someone committed a bad merge. The doesn't mean it hasn't worked
>> for the most part.
> So, just to be clear:
> Something that's backpatched goes into both master and the backpatch CHANGELOG.
> And the order in the CHANGELOG is chronological, *not*
> version-ordered? (resulting in mixed versions in head, but consistent
> version ordering in backbranches)?
And for the record - I find it a PITA too; but... it's *much* easier
for me than trying to find another few hours for additional tedious
release prep tasks.
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2010-12-31 15:24:13|
|Subject: Re: Email notification pgAgent|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2010-12-31 15:09:38|
|Subject: Re: Trac tickets|