Re: Re: starting to review the Extend NOT NULL representation to pg_constraint patch

From: Andrew Geery <andrew(dot)geery(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: starting to review the Extend NOT NULL representation to pg_constraint patch
Date: 2010-10-14 01:41:46
Message-ID: AANLkTinaR066uc-YnzQVVbbwc8ZMCwKq+Zvq9Z-f_G3X@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I'll post it sometime tomorrow...
Thanks
Andrew

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> wrote:
>> --On 30. September 2010 10:12:48 +0200 Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, there where some changes in the meantime to the master which
>>> generate some merge failures...will provide a new version along with
>>> other fixes soon
>>
>> Here's a new patch that addresses all DDL commands around NOT NULL
>> constraints and maintain and follow inheritance information correctly now
>> (but it lags documentation updates). I hope i haven't introduced nasty bugs
>> and broke something badly, some deeper testing is welcome.
>
> This appears to be waiting on further review from Andrew Geery.
> Andrew, will you be posting a new review soon?
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Itagaki Takahiro 2010-10-14 01:44:50 Re: rollback to savepoint leads to transaction already in progress
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-10-14 01:39:04 Re: Why do we have a database specification in .pgpass?