Re: Problem with pg_upgrade?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem with pg_upgrade?
Date: 2011-03-31 16:08:34
Message-ID: AANLkTinZU3y5eojGPTj_pCCESoJqncn3JgUnUu3GTs1P@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>  I think the maintenance
>> overhead of an invisible variable is too much.
>
> A simple GUC or command-line switch isn't much code.

I like the idea of a command-line switch.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-03-31 16:11:33 Re: Problem with pg_upgrade?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-03-31 16:07:32 Re: Problem with pg_upgrade?