On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:54 PM, George Sexton <georges(at)mhsoftware(dot)com> wrote:
> I'll throw in my 2 cents worth:
> 1) Performance using RAID 1 for reads sucks. You would expect throughput to
> double in this configuration, but it doesn't. That said, performance for
> RAID 1 is not noticeably worse than Linux MD. My testing showed the 3Ware
> controller to be about 20% faster than Linux MD for RAID 1.
No performance improvement is expected for streaming reads in any
non-striped RAID1. Random reads should nearly double in throughput.
You can use Linux's software RAID10 module to improve streaming reads
of a "mirror" using the "far" layout which in effect stripes the data
across 2 disks at the expense of some hit in streaming write
performance. Testing is required to determine if this tradeoff works
for your workload or not.
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2010-09-20 22:28:53|
|Subject: Re: Auto ANALYZE criteria|
|Previous:||From: George Sexton||Date: 2010-09-20 21:54:32|
|Subject: Re: 3ware trivia overload|