On 1 September 2010 06:45, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
> The aggregate docs say:
>
>> The first form of aggregate expression invokes the aggregate across all input rows for which the given expression(s) yield non-null values. (Actually, it is up to the aggregate function whether to ignore null values or not — but all the standard ones do.)
>
> -- http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/sql-expressions.html#SYNTAX-AGGREGATES
>
> That, however, is not true of array_agg():
>
> try=# CREATE TABLE foo(id int);
> CREATE TABLE
> try=# INSERT INTO foo values(1), (2), (NULL), (3);
> INSERT 0 4
> try=# select array_agg(id) from foo;
>  array_agg
> ──────────────
>  {1,2,NULL,3}
> (1 row)
>
> So are the docs right, or is array_agg() right?

I think it might be both.  array_agg doesn't return NULL, it returns
an array which contains NULL.

-- 
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

In response to

• array_agg() NULL Handling at 2010-09-01 05:45:05 from David E. Wheeler

Responses

• Re: array_agg() NULL Handling at 2010-09-01 07:03:41 from David E. Wheeler
• Re: array_agg() NULL Handling at 2010-09-01 08:06:48 from Thom Brown

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: David E. Wheeler	Date: 2010-09-01 07:03:41
	Subject: Re: array_agg() NULL Handling
Previous:	From: Sushant Sinha	Date: 2010-09-01 06:42:04
	Subject: Re: english parser in text search: support for multiple words in the same position