| From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Primary Key index |
| Date: | 2010-08-26 19:19:05 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinUvsadhOhoRAU2v0S54Y0OFTW2yCsyBMuV9JKC@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 26 August 2010 20:16, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Looks good. Do we usually got into fine details such as the name
>> of the index? They'll see the index name returned when they
>> create the table or add the constraint anyway, and if they missed
>> it they only need to do a "\dt tablename" to find out what it was.
>
> Hmmm... Perhaps that is overkill. It seemed like a good idea at
> the time, but I'm not inclined to argue about it if it seems too
> detailed to you. Revised patch attached.
>
> -Kevin
>
>
Yeah, I think that covers it well. :)
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-08-26 20:14:06 | Re: Primary Key index |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-08-26 19:16:50 | Re: Primary Key index |