Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix various possible problems with synchronous replication.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix various possible problems with synchronous replication.
Date: 2011-03-18 14:23:39
Message-ID: AANLkTinTP8VDWtf9-Q+vd0V=06hP_MgtZmdGxkYyPL0b@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> On 17 March 2011 17:55, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>>> errdetail("The transaction has already been committed locally but
>>> might have not been replicated to the standby.")));
>>> errdetail("The transaction has committed locally, but may not have
>>> replicated to the standby.")));
>>>
>>> Could we have these saying precisely the same thing?
>>
>> Yeah.  Which is better?
>
> Personally I prefer the 2nd.  It reads better somehow.

I hacked on this a bit more and ended up with a hybrid of the two.
Hope you like it; but anyway it's consistent.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-03-18 14:27:05
Subject: Re: Sync Rep and shutdown Re: Sync Rep v19
Previous:From: Markus WannerDate: 2011-03-18 14:19:56
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Markus WannerDate: 2011-03-18 14:37:26
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-03-18 14:23:04
Subject: pgsql: Make synchronous replication query cancel/die messages morecons

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group