On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 23:53, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 00:06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Is there any difference between the network connectivity of
>>> git.postgresql.org and the old anoncvs server?
>> Yes, they are in completely different datacenters.
>> I had a discussoin with Stefan a couple of days ago about this, and
>> the current estimate is that we're simply hitting the bandwidth limit
>> of where it is now, because it now takes so much more traffic. We have
>> some space on another machine that we can move the VM to, so we'll be
>> looking at doing that when things have calmed down a bit after getting
>> back from PGDay.EU. This will cause some short downtime as DNS
>> switches over, so we'll post a note on exactly when we plan to do it,
>> once it's planned.
> Sounds like a plan. Thanks.
> (BTW, since it's just a read-only clone of master, couldn't you avoid
> downtime by duplicating the VM and running two in parallel until the DNS
> change propagates fully? Or are you just thinking it's not worth the
It's not just that. It also runs git hosting for a bunch of projects,
including but certainly not limited to pgadmin and slony, where it is
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2010-12-10 22:53:32|
|Subject: Documentation for "PostgreSQL 9"?|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-12-09 22:53:26|
|Subject: Re: Why so many buildfarm errors with contacting "git.postgresql.org"? |