On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Itagaki Takahiro
> I think the patch is almost ready to commit, but still
> have some comments for the usability and documentations.
> I hope native English speakers would help improving docs.
I'm checking the latest patch for applying.
I found we actually use maintenance_work_mem for the sort in seqscan+sort
case, but the cost was estimated based on work_mem in the patch. I added
internal cost_sort_with_mem() into costsize.c.
> * Documentation could be a bit more simplified like as
> "CLUSTER requires twice disk spaces of your original table".
> The added description seems too difficult for standard users.
I re-ordered some description in the doc. Does it look better?
Comments and suggestions welcome.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-09-28 02:52:40|
|Subject: Re: levenshtein_less_equal (was: multibyte charater set in
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-09-28 01:27:27|
|Subject: Re: PlaceHolderVars versus join ordering |