2010/9/1 David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>:
> The aggregate docs say:
>
>> The first form of aggregate expression invokes the aggregate across all input rows for which the given expression(s) yield non-null values. (Actually, it is up to the aggregate function whether to ignore null values or not — but all the standard ones do.)
>
> -- http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/sql-expressions.html#SYNTAX-AGGREGATES
>
> That, however, is not true of array_agg():
>
> try=# CREATE TABLE foo(id int);
> CREATE TABLE
> try=# INSERT INTO foo values(1), (2), (NULL), (3);
> INSERT 0 4
> try=# select array_agg(id) from foo;
>  array_agg
> ──────────────
>  {1,2,NULL,3}
> (1 row)
>
> So are the docs right, or is array_agg() right?

Docs is wrong :) I like current implementation. You can remove a NULLs
from aggregation very simply, but different direction isn't possible

Regards
Pavel Stehule
>
> Best,
>
> David
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

• array_agg() NULL Handling at 2010-09-01 05:45:05 from David E. Wheeler

Responses

• Re: array_agg() NULL Handling at 2010-09-01 15:16:41 from David E. Wheeler
• Re: array_agg() NULL Handling at 2010-09-01 16:08:04 from David E. Wheeler

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Fujii Masao	Date: 2010-09-01 07:53:38
	Subject: Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry
Previous:	From: Heikki Linnakangas	Date: 2010-09-01 07:11:39
	Subject: Re: Interruptible sleeps (was Re: CommitFest 2009-07: Yay, Kevin! Thanks, reviewers!)