| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: We need to log aborted autovacuums |
| Date: | 2011-01-31 03:26:01 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinOHDdf-DS6p_NGOuUsPawNqGKQOhUwfth3qYTD@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of dom ene 30 23:37:51 -0300 2011:
>
>> Unless I'm missing something, making autovacuum.c call
>> ConditionalLockRelationOid() is not going to work, because the vacuum
>> transaction isn't started until we get all the way down to
>> vacuum_rel().
>
> Maybe we need ConditionalLockRelationOidForSession or something like
> that?
That'd be another way to go, if there are objections to what I've
implemented here.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shigeru HANADA | 2011-01-31 03:27:55 | Re: review: FDW API |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-01-31 03:03:19 | Re: We need to log aborted autovacuums |