| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Suggested changes to Book pages |
| Date: | 2010-11-11 18:05:06 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinLczijkPprSOxyzFCE6kfsbpsTCa88kvGtpxyd@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On ons, 2010-11-10 at 14:42 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think marking version numbers for each book is a good idea, though I
>> would be inclined to get more specific than 7/8/9.
>
> How do you know which exact version a particular book covers? Isn't
> mentioned the date of publication a more neutral and robust approach?
I can't imagine that figuring out the versions the book covers is all
that hard, and it seems a lot more useful than just the publication
date, although of course we could have both.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2010-11-11 18:23:57 | Re: Suggested changes to Book pages |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-11-11 07:52:20 | Re: Suggested changes to Book pages |