Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [RRR] CommitFest 2010-07 final report

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [RRR] CommitFest 2010-07 final report
Date: 2010-09-13 11:44:38
Message-ID: AANLkTinK6JzMzb+j-4Fcg0HcofhgAe4scyoyXSPs=Vi9@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-rrreviewers
On 18 August 2010 22:45, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> At the close of the 2010-07 CommitFest, the numbers were:
>
> 72 patches were submitted
>  3 patches were withdrawn (deleted) by their authors
> 14 patches were moved to CommitFest 2010-09
> --
> 55 patches in CommitFest 2010-07
> --
>  3 committed to 9.0
> --
> 52 patches for 9.1
> --
>  1 rejected
> 20 returned with feedback
> 31 committed for 9.1
>
> When we hit the end of the allotted time, I moved the last two
> patches to the next CF, for want of a better idea for disposition.
> One is "Ready for Committer" with an author who is a committer.  The
> other is my WiP patch for serializable transactions -- there's a lot
> to review and the reviewer had unexpected demands on his time during
> the CF; he said he'll continue work on that outside the CF.
>
> -Kevin
>
>
> At the end of week four:
>
>> 72 patches were submitted
>>  3 patches were withdrawn (deleted) by their authors
>> 12 patches were moved to CommitFest 2010-09
>> --
>> 57 patches in CommitFest 2010-07
>> --
>>  3 committed to 9.0
>> --
>> 54 patches for 9.1
>> --
>>  1 rejected
>> 18 returned with feedback
>> 28 committed for 9.1
>> --
>> 47 disposed
>> --
>>  7 pending
>>  2 ready for committer
>> --
>>  5 will still need reviewer attention
>>  1 waiting on author to respond to review
>> --
>>  4 patches need review now and have a reviewer assigned

So did the materialized views patch not get submitted?

-- 
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-09-13 11:46:57
Subject: Re: security label support, revised
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-09-13 11:40:15
Subject: Reducing walreceiver latency with a latch

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-09-13 12:00:16
Subject: Re: [RRR] CommitFest 2010-07 final report
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2010-09-13 04:55:30
Subject: Commitfest September 2010 Plans and Call for Reviewers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group