| From: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: First stab at 9.0 release announcement |
| Date: | 2010-06-24 08:54:21 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinI68fPyxehL02bHhLoYjTHrsH5Mx_yv2F4UTAM@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 24 June 2010 09:35, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Thom Brown wrote:
>>> > ? ?The PostgreSQL Global Development Team is proud to announce the release of
>>> > ? ?PostgreSQL 9.0. This is the 31st release of the world's leading open
>>> > ? ?source relational database system.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Hmm... saying 31st almost sounds like it's just another normal
>>> release. Couldn't you make it something like "This landmark version
>>> marks the 31st release of..."
>>
>> Getting '31' in there certainly reinforces our seriousness as a
>> database and as a community.
>
> Only if it has some grounding in fact - noone has answered Kevin's
> question yet about what it actually refers to.
>
I can't get to that number either. If you take the 6 releases from
the 6.x series, 5 from 7.x, 5 from 8.x and then 9, that's 17. Does
throwing in Postgres95 and POSTGRES 1.x, 2.x, 3.x, 4.x bring it up to
31?
Thom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rob Napier | 2010-06-24 13:20:05 | Re: First stab at 9.0 release announcement |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2010-06-24 08:35:20 | Re: First stab at 9.0 release announcement |