Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: disposition of remaining patches

From: marcin mank <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: disposition of remaining patches
Date: 2011-02-25 13:25:09
Message-ID: AANLkTinGf4-EFh+HEyiD+q1hR95VCtVE+egn-O7uq711@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Right now, as it stands, the syncrep patch will be happy as soon as
> the data has been fsynced to either B or A-prime; I don't think we can
> guarantee at any point that A-prime can become the leader, and feed B.
>

- start A` up, replicating from A
- shutdown B (now A nad A` are synchronous)
now real quick:
- shut down A
- shut down A`
-change configuration
-start up A`
-start up B

Doesn`t this work?

Greetings
Marcin

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-02-25 14:58:36
Subject: wCTE: why not finish sub-updates at the end, not the beginning?
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-02-25 13:18:40
Subject: Re: WIP: cross column correlation ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group