On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Right now, as it stands, the syncrep patch will be happy as soon as
> the data has been fsynced to either B or A-prime; I don't think we can
> guarantee at any point that A-prime can become the leader, and feed B.
>

- start A` up, replicating from A
- shutdown B (now A nad A` are synchronous)
now real quick:
- shut down A
- shut down A`
-change configuration
-start up A`
-start up B

Doesn`t this work?

Greetings
Marcin

In response to

• Re: disposition of remaining patches at 2011-02-25 08:14:18 from Daniel Farina

Responses

• Re: disposition of remaining patches at 2011-02-25 19:24:31 from Daniel Farina

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2011-02-25 14:58:36
	Subject: wCTE: why not finish sub-updates at the end, not the beginning?
Previous:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2011-02-25 13:18:40
	Subject: Re: WIP: cross column correlation ...